Few people who visit Britain's countryside when Rhododendron ponticum is in
flower can comprehend the damage that has been caused to our native flora and fauna by
this exotic Victorian introduction. (Although there are hundreds of species of
Rhododendron, it is only R ponticum which is known to be a problem.)
||The plant is responsible for the destruction of many
native habitats and the abandonment of land throughout the British Isles. The reason for
this is simple. Where conditions are suitable, R ponticum will out compete most
native plants. It will grow to many times the height of a person, allowing very little
light to penetrate through its thick leaf canopy. This effectively eliminates other
competing native plant species which are unable to grow due to insufficient light. This in
turn leads to the consequent loss of the associated native animals.
Rhododendron ponticum is native to countries in the western
and eastern Mediterranean such as Spain, Portugal and Turkey and also occurs eastwards to
Asia. It is not native to Britain, but was first introduced in the late 18th Century. It
became especially popular on country estates in Victorian times, providing ornamental
value, as well as cover for game birds.
research indicates that British Rhododendron ponticum originates from Spanish
and Portuguese introductions.
R ponticum thrives in milder, wet climatic
conditions, where there are poor, acidic soils. Unless established stands are constantly
kept in check, they will expand into adjacent areas, rapidly eliminating the majority of
native plant species. The twentieth century demise of many former country estates and the
consequent lack of control of remaining R ponticum, has allowed this species to invade large areas of the British countryside.
R ponticum invades areas both vegetatively
and via seed. Established plants spread by lateral horizontal growth of the branches. A
single plant may eventually end up covering many metres of ground with thickly interlaced,
impenetrable branches. Where the horizontal branches touch the ground, they will root,
continually extending the area of R ponticum cover.
||It is worth
noting that because of its extremely lateral growth form, R ponticum plants are
capable of extending well into areas which otherwise would not be suitable for their
growth. For example, R ponticum is capable of dominating large areas of wetland
with its canopy, while the main stem and roots of the plant are well back on suitably dry
For the same reason, streams can become completely
overgrown and shaded out by R ponticum growing on the banks. This severely affects animal life in the stream. Fish
such as trout depend upon invertebrates which fall off native bankside vegetation for 80%
of their food.
R ponticum seeds are
tiny and hence wind dispersed. Each flower head can produce between three and seven
thousand seeds, so that a large bush can produce several million seeds per year. Of
course not all the seeds will grow successfully, but given the right conditions, a good
many will germinate.
Seedlings have difficulty becoming established in areas where there
is already continuous ground cover from native plants. Establishment is best in disturbed
areas where the native vegetation has been in some way disrupted, providing an opening in
the plant cover. The seedlings also germinate well in areas covered in moss. This may be
because of the water holding capacity of the mosses.
(fungal) associations with the roots of R ponticum plants provide great competitive advantage and allow the plants to flourish
in nutrient-poor soils. The mycorrhizae are specific to ericaceous plants. This includes
heathers. R ponticum therefore has a huge advantage over other non-ericaceous plants which may
not have their own mycorrhizal network. This may also explain why the plant is so
successful at colonizing heathlands, as the heathers which exist there have already
established suitable mycorrhizal networks.
Toxicity of Rhododendron
Potentially toxic chemicals, particularly 'free' phenols, and
diterpenes, occur in significant quantities in the tissues of plants of Rhododendron
species. Diterpenes, known as grayanotoxins, occur in the leaves, flowers and nectar of
Rhododendrons. These differ from species to species. Not all species produce them,
although Rhododendron ponticum does.
These toxins make Rhododendron unpalatable to most herbivores.
Phenols are most concentrated in the young tissues, such as young emergent leaves and
buds. This provides a primary defense against herbivores, before the tissues have acquired
the added deterrent of physical toughness found in older tissues. Young emergent leaf buds
have the additional protection of a sticky exudate which also contains phenols. This
physically discourages small invertebrates from eating the buds, because they get stuck in
the exudate. Its poisonous nature must act as a further discouragement.
Grazing animals are discouraged from eating Rhododendron foliage
because of its toughness and unpalatability. The unpalatability is learned and cases of poisoning may result in
animals such as sheep and cattle, if they ingest sufficient quantities because of extreme
hunger or inexperience. The general toxicity of Rhododendron to herbivores means that it
cannot usually be controlled by grazing.
Cases of human poisoning are also known. Most are caused by the
consumption of honey produced from Rhododendron flowers. This is known as 'Mad Honey Disease', or 'Honey
Intoxication'. Cases of this have been recorded from as far back as 400 BC. It results in
relatively short-lived intestinal and cardiac problems and is rarely fatal. The severity
of symptoms depends on the amount of contaminated honey consumed. It is worth thinking
carefully about the siting of bee hives if Rhododendron is a prominent feature of the
Effects of Rhododendron
There is some evidence for allelopathic interactions (the
production of adverse effects on other species) between Rhododendron and other plants.
This may include the inhibition of germination, or of establishment of the seedlings of
competing species. Direct poisoning is a possibility. As noted above, the
tissues of Rhododendron contain significant quantities of phenols and other potentially
toxic chemicals. There is also evidence for the prevention of mycorrhizal development
in roots of the seedlings of competing plant species. Research and debate in this field is
Once R ponticum
has invaded an area, few native plants survive. In woodlands only those trees which manage
to grow above the level of the R ponticum canopy will persist. These of course,
have a finite life span. On their death, there is no replacement because seedlings cannot
become established under the lightless canopy. At this point, the R ponticum completely dominates the area. This is particularly
noticeable in Silver Birch woodlands as this species is short lived.
Once the native plants have disappeared, the animals which rely upon
them either directly or indirectly for food cannot survive. Thus R ponticum areas are essentially barren. Even where trees
exist above the R ponticum canopy,
species such as woodland butterflies disappear. This is because the caterpillars of most
woodland butterflies can only feed on the wildflowers and grasses which are found in the
glades and rides of well managed woodland.
||The Dormouse, one of
Britain's most endangered species of mammal, has been severely affected by habitat loss.
Some of this has been because R ponticum
has out-competed native plants and shrubs which are essential for the dormouse to survive.
The toxicity of R ponticum and its alien status means that there are few animal species
associated with it in Britain. However, a number of herbivorous invertebrate species have
been linked to it.
Most of these are not restricted or specific to R ponticum. It is important to bear in mind that just
because a species has been found on R ponticum, it does not mean that it
habitually lives there. It may have fallen or been blown into the R ponticum from neighbouring native plant species. The canopies of trees
can contain vast numbers of individuals of different invertebrate species. It is common
for these to fall or be blown off to locations other than their chosen habitat. Indeed the
air can contain an astonishing variety and number of small organisms, including
invertebrates. Spiders are even able to balloon hundreds of miles in air currents. Biomass (the total weight of individuals) of the species is also
important. One individual of a species does not imply an association, whereas a plant
covered in a great many individuals would tend to indicate some sort of relationship.
Occasionally a few R
ponticum leaves can be found which have obviously been eaten by an insect. However
the toxicity of the leaves means that this may well have resulted in the subsequent death
of the individual(s) concerned. R ponticum growth is in no way controlled by
herbivores feeding on it in great numbers. Even if the odd, isolated herbivore can
occasionally be found on R ponticum, there is certainly little in the way of
biomass to feed carnivores such as other invertebrates and birds. There is also the added
likelihood that any herbivore feeding on R ponticum would also contain toxins derived from the foliage.
The flowers of R
ponticum are very attractive to insects, particularly Bumble Bees. In the main
flowering period of May/June, the exotic showy blooms monopolize the attentions of
pollinating insects, virtually to the exclusion of all others. This means that the flowers
of native plant species in the vicinity suffer from a lack of pollinating insects. As a
result they may not successfully set seed. This is yet another way that R ponticum may be detrimental to competing native vegetation.
All of this means that areas dominated by R ponticum have an exceedingly impoverished fauna in
comparison to native habitats, both in terms of species and of biomass. If there is little
eating the R ponticum, then it follows that there are few or no carnivores eating
these herbivores and so also, few top carnivores. Song birds which feed on either seeds or
invertebrates are reduced to trying to survive in smaller numbers by feeding in areas
above or adjacent to the R ponticum.
Once the song bird populations decline so do species such as sparrowhawks which predate
Many broadleaf woodlands are capable of supporting a complex and
interlinked rich diversity of plant and animal life. This is because there can be as many
as four distinct layers of vegetation. These are:
- The climax vegetation which consists of mature trees such as Oak or
- An understorey of shorter, shade tolerant woody species such as Hazel
- A field layer which is typically of grasses and wild flowers.
- A ground layer of mosses and lichens.
Crucially, each layer supports a whole range of invertebrates which
in turn support the larger and larger animals which make up the food chain. To put the
value of native plants in perspective, a single species such as Willow, can support over
400 different species of insect and mite. There may well be hundreds or even thousands of
individuals of each of the species present representing a large biomass.
However it is not just woodlands which have suffered. Heathlands,
which have declined by 75% in just the latter half of this century, have also been
seriously affected. Once again, R ponticum
dominates many such areas and as a consequence, the heathland plants and animals
originally present have disappeared. It is hardly surprising therefore to find that
habitat destruction, including that caused by R ponticum, is responsible for the disappearance of 150 species from Britain in 100
Restoring areas which have been colonized by R ponticum is not just a matter of cutting the vegetation.
The plant is notoriously difficult and expensive to actually kill. The leaves are waxy and
herbicide treatment must include a chemical additive to help break this surface down. Even
then, where R ponticum is well
established with a large root system, such herbicide treatment usually has to be done over
several years. This is because herbicides do not translocate well through the plant.
Techniques such as mist spraying or tractor application are usually
out of the question in woodlands because of the risk to trees.
There are a variety of techniques for the mechanical removal of R ponticum. These
usually employ a tractor or tracked swing shovel with a rotary flail mounted on a moving
hydraulic arm. In sensitive conservation areas such techniques may well not be
appropriate. Such mechanical devices often leave a thick layer of smashed Rhododendron on
the ground which may have to be removed using expensive manual labour.
||Once R ponticum has
been removed and eradicated the toxic humus layer (left) still remains. Where this has built up over a number of years the resulting
thick mat prevents natural regeneration. The only solution is to remove the layer. This
often cannot be done by mechanical means and thus may require several hand operations to
effect conditions which favour regeneration. However, even then, reinfestation can easily
occur from the millions of seeds which will have been produced over the years. Thus areas
where R ponticum has been present
require careful monitoring over a number of years. Prompt action must be taken at a
relatively early stage to prevent re-establishment.
Further problems exist because any serious
infestation is likely to affect neighbouring areas which may not be in the same ownership.
Unless these areas are cleared, the seeds as well as the limbs of the plant will encroach.
Given time, a single plant can cover 100 metres² and grow to more than 10 metres high.
This should be taken into account when making out a management plan. Each site is
different but where there has been a significant presence of this plant and where it is
present in adjacent areas, it is prudent to budget for a reinfestation figure of 15% per
year after initial clearance.
In summary: R ponticum is an introduced species. It is highly invasive
where conditions suit it. R ponticum destroys habitats and thus whole colonies of
native plants and animals disappear. Because it is so expensive to control and physically
prevents access, land has been abandoned. However, such areas can be restored but
reinfestation must be prevented. Clearance of an area of R ponticum is but the
first stage of restoration. Subsequent control measures may take several years to
eradicate the R ponticum. Even then a viable seed bank may exist for many years.
On some sites eradication may not be possible because of reinfestation from adjacent
More information: Woodland restoration in
a severely infested R ponticum woodland. Complete report and
surveys. Information about allelopathy by
cleared Rhododendron here.